↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Light therapies for acne

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
Title
Light therapies for acne
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007917.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelena Barbaric, Rachel Abbott, Pawel Posadzki, Mate Car, Laura H Gunn, Alison M Layton, Azeem Majeed, Josip Car

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 380 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 120 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Psychology 18 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 135 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#905,589
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,633
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,277
of 334,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.