↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical treatment for facial burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Topical treatment for facial burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008058.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelis J Hoogewerf, Margriet E Van Baar, M Jenda Hop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Irma MMH Oen, Esther Middelkoop

Abstract

Burn injuries are an important health problem. They occur frequently in the head and neck region - the area central to a person's identity, that provides our most expressive means of communication. Topical interventions are currently the cornerstone of treatment of partial-thickness burns to the face.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 120 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,518,861
of 17,131,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,074
of 11,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,045
of 256,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#359
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,131,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.