↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for amphetamine psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for amphetamine psychosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003026.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Shoptaw, Uyen Kao, Walter Ling

Abstract

Chronic amphetamine users may have experience of paranoia and hallucination. It has long been believed that dopamine antagonists, such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, and thioridazine, are effective for the treatment of amphetamine psychosis.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 62 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 30%
Psychology 30 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,890,208
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,833
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,794
of 191,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.