↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for amphetamine psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for amphetamine psychosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003026.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Shoptaw, Uyen Kao, Walter Ling

Abstract

Chronic amphetamine users may have experience of paranoia and hallucination. It has long been believed that dopamine antagonists, such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, and thioridazine, are effective for the treatment of amphetamine psychosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 60 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 30%
Psychology 30 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,793,045
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,856
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,490
of 185,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.