↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cradle hold versus alternate positions for bottle feeding preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Cradle hold versus alternate positions for bottle feeding preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013933
Authors

Jennifer A Dawson, Jann P Foster, Susan E Jacobs, Leanne Myers, Elaine Burns

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,951,749
of 21,836,385 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,445
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,806
of 337,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,836,385 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.