| Title |
Discharge planning from hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000313.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Natasha A Lannin, Lindy Clemson, Ian D Cameron, Sasha Shepperd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 24% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 434 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 165 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 175 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#884,980
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,718
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,894
of 453,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.