↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009662.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Tse, Yuhong Yuan, Paul Moayyedi, Grigorios I Leontiadis

Abstract

Cannulation techniques have been recognized to be important in causing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, considerable controversy exists about the usefulness of the guidewire-assisted cannulation technique for the prevention of PEP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 30 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,797,667
of 21,172,126 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,341
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,942
of 280,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#268
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,172,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.