↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001507.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey Remmington, Sherie Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 40 45%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 40 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 24 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#12,821,197
of 21,907,648 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,867
of 12,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,612
of 338,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,907,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.