↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for paraneoplastic neuropathies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for paraneoplastic neuropathies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007625.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Giometto, Roberta Vitaliani, Elisabeth Lindeck-Pozza, Wolfgang Grisold, Christian Vedeler

Abstract

It is not unusual to observe peripheral nervous system involvement in people with tumours outside the nervous system. Any part of the peripheral nervous system can be involved, from sensory and motor neurons to nerve roots and plexuses, from distal trunks to neuromuscular junctions. Pathogenesis also varies from direct infiltration by cancer cells, to treatment toxicity, to metabolic derangement, cachexia, infections and paraneoplastic syndromes.Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are symptoms or signs resulting from damage to organs or tissues that are remote from the site of the malignancy or its metastases. The pathogenesis is thought to be immune-mediated as a result of a cross-reaction against antigens shared by the tumour and nervous system cells.Paraneoplastic neuropathies are the most frequently reported paraneoplastic syndromes. They are, however, heterogeneous and require several therapeutic approaches. This review was undertaken to systematically assess any data available from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of paraneoplastic syndromes of the peripheral nervous system and not the whole range of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,263,666
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,773
of 12,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,006
of 278,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.