Title |
Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006475.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David A Osborn, John KH Sinn |
Abstract |
The composition of the intestinal microflora may be different in individuals with atopic eczema from those without this condition, and such differences may precede the development of eczema. Probiotics are live bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tract and provide a health benefit to the host. Probiotics added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Ecuador | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Estonia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 17% |
Researcher | 25 | 12% |
Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 11% |
Unknown | 71 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 11% |
Unknown | 83 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#839,590
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,803
of 12,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,474
of 75,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.