↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reconstructive Techniques After Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Reconstructive Techniques After Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006040.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl J Brown, Darlene Fenech, Robin S McLeod

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,334,632
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,764
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,858
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.