| Title |
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003283.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huib AAM Van Vliet, David A Grimes, Frans M Helmerhorst, Kenneth F Schulz, Laureen M Lopez |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,257
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,200
of 12,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,687
of 66,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.