↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009569.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xudong Yang, Yao Cheng, Nansheng Cheng, Jianping Gong, Lian Bai, Longshuan Zhao, Yilei Deng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 32 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 32 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,325,990
of 26,099,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,671
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,048
of 455,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,099,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.