↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012979.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tulasi Kota Karanth, Veena Kota Laxminarayan KL Karanth, Bryan K Ward, Bradford A Woodworth, Laxminarayan Karanth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 20 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 76%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,168,801
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,355
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,916
of 441,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.