↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Remote, face-to-face, and group-based interventions for promoting strength training in healthy community-based adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Remote, face-to-face, and group-based interventions for promoting strength training in healthy community-based adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014825
Authors

Rebecca Gould, Nia W Roberts, Elaine M Murtagh, Melvyn Hillsdon, Charles Foster

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,575,481
of 22,214,042 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,513
of 12,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,551
of 344,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,214,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.