↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007235.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo Berghella, Jason K Baxter, Nancy W Hendrix

Abstract

Measurement of cervical length (CL) by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is predictive of preterm birth (PTB). It is unclear if this screening test is effective for prevention of PTB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,496,403
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,034
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,301
of 291,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.