| Title |
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009419.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Jones, William D‐C Man, Wei Gao, Irene J Higginson, Andrew Wilcock, Matthew Maddocks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 21% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Iraq | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 816 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 810 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 124 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 12% |
| Researcher | 75 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 6% |
| Other | 152 | 19% |
| Unknown | 250 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 141 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 55 | 7% |
| Engineering | 20 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 95 | 12% |
| Unknown | 287 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,038,623
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,066
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,964
of 325,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.