| Title |
Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015226 |
| Authors |
Nicola Lindson, Annika Theodoulou, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Paul Aveyard, Thomas R Fanshawe, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Alex J Sutton, Suzanne C Freeman, Sanjay Agrawal, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,157,270
of 24,461,214 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,929
of 12,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,845
of 433,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,461,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.