Title |
Multinutrient fortification of human breast milk for preterm infants following hospital discharge
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004866.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren Young, Nicholas D Embleton, Felicia M McCormick, William McGuire |
Abstract |
Preterm infants are usually growth restricted at hospital discharge. Feeding preterm infants after hospital discharge with multinutrient fortified breast milk rather than unfortified breast milk may facilitate more rapid catch-up growth and improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 227 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
Researcher | 25 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 13% |
Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 8% |
Unknown | 85 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#1,848,594
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,951
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,344
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.