| Title |
Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009125.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasiliki Orgeta, Phuong Leung, Rafael del-Pino-Casado, Afifa Qazi, Martin Orrell, Aimee E Spector, Abigail M Methley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 18% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 45 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#96,866
of 24,860,845 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,001
of 435,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,860,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.