↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effect of pharmacist‐provided non‐dispensing services on patient outcomes, health service utilisation and costs in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effect of pharmacist‐provided non‐dispensing services on patient outcomes, health service utilisation and costs in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sami Pande, Janet E Hiller, Nancy Nkansah, Lisa Bero

Abstract

The role of pharmacists has expanded beyond dispensing and packaging over the past two decades, and now includes ensuring rational use of drugs, improving clinical outcomes and promoting health status by working with the public and other healthcare professionals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 614 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 111 17%
Researcher 75 12%
Student > Bachelor 67 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 10%
Other 34 5%
Other 115 18%
Unknown 168 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 64 10%
Social Sciences 29 5%
Psychology 16 3%
Other 67 11%
Unknown 200 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,670,155
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,553
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,589
of 205,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.