| Title |
The effect of pharmacist-provided non-dispensing services on patient outcomes, health service utilisation and costs in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sami Pande, Janet E Hiller, Nancy Nkansah, Lisa Bero |
| Abstract |
The role of pharmacists has expanded beyond dispensing and packaging over the past two decades, and now includes ensuring rational use of drugs, improving clinical outcomes and promoting health status by working with the public and other healthcare professionals. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Mali | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 586 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 109 | 18% |
| Researcher | 74 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 17% |
| Unknown | 160 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 191 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 62 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Psychology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 190 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,553,784
of 24,460,744 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,472
of 12,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,901
of 196,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,460,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.