↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005147.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Morriss, Indira Vinjamuri, Mohammad Amir Faizal, Catherine A Bolton, James P McCarthy

Abstract

Schizophrenia has a lifetime prevalence of less than one per cent. Studies have indicated that early symptoms that are idiosyncratic to the person with schizophrenia (early warning signs) often precede acute psychotic relapse. Early warning signs interventions propose that learning to detect and manage early warning signs of impending relapse might prevent or delay acute psychotic relapse.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 286 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 20%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 86 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 27%
Psychology 45 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 14%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 95 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,915,442
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,518
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,695
of 195,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.