↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesl Grobler, Nandi Siegfried, Marianne E Visser, Sarah SN Mahlungulu, Jimmy Volmink

Abstract

Adequate nutrition is important for optimal immune and metabolic function. Dietary support may, therefore, improve clinical outcomes in HIV-infected individuals by reducing the incidence of HIV-associated complications and attenuating progression of HIV disease, improving quality of life and ultimately reducing disease-related mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 418 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 20%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Researcher 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 10%
Student > Postgraduate 30 7%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 71 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 5%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Psychology 11 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 90 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#536,292
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,288
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,343
of 157,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.