| Title |
Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004536.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liesl Grobler, Nandi Siegfried, Marianne E Visser, Sarah SN Mahlungulu, Jimmy Volmink |
| Abstract |
Adequate nutrition is important for optimal immune and metabolic function. Dietary support may, therefore, improve clinical outcomes in HIV-infected individuals by reducing the incidence of HIV-associated complications and attenuating progression of HIV disease, improving quality of life and ultimately reducing disease-related mortality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 546 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 98 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 12% |
| Researcher | 62 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 19% |
| Unknown | 146 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Psychology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 64 | 11% |
| Unknown | 172 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#959,505
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,890
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,637
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.