↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesl Grobler, Nandi Siegfried, Marianne E Visser, Sarah SN Mahlungulu, Jimmy Volmink

Abstract

Adequate nutrition is important for optimal immune and metabolic function. Dietary support may, therefore, improve clinical outcomes in HIV-infected individuals by reducing the incidence of HIV-associated complications and attenuating progression of HIV disease, improving quality of life and ultimately reducing disease-related mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 499 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 19%
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Researcher 57 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 10%
Student > Postgraduate 30 6%
Other 99 19%
Unknown 119 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 186 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Psychology 14 3%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 142 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#787,533
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,630
of 12,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,631
of 194,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.