↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
Title
Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003844.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Petrucci, Carlo De Feo

Abstract

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury require mechanical ventilatory support. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury are further complicated by ventilator-induced lung injury. Lung protective ventilation strategies may lead to improved survival. This systematic review is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 2003 and updated in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 331 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 43 12%
Student > Postgraduate 40 12%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Master 31 9%
Other 92 27%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 196 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 81 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,619,499
of 21,744,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,735
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,670
of 171,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,744,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.