↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
Title
Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003844.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Petrucci, Carlo De Feo

Abstract

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury require mechanical ventilatory support. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury are further complicated by ventilator-induced lung injury. Lung protective ventilation strategies may lead to improved survival. This systematic review is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 2003 and updated in 2007.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 391 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 41 10%
Student > Master 34 8%
Other 102 25%
Unknown 97 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 217 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Social Sciences 5 1%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 111 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,140,811
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,365
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,497
of 206,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.