↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
Title
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000396.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pepijn DDM Roelofs, Rick A Deyo, Bart W Koes, Rob JPM Scholten, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 387 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 16%
Student > Master 51 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 11%
Researcher 41 10%
Other 35 9%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 90 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 104 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#614,286
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,106
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,515
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.