| Title |
Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012652.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda J Cross, Jenifer Liang, Dennis Thomas, Elida Zairina, Michael J Abramson, Johnson George |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,628,316
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,646
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,507
of 431,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.