↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non‐trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non‐trauma patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013710.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yao Cheng, Ke Wang, Junhua Gong, Zuojin Liu, Jianping Gong, Zhong Zeng, Xiaomei Wang

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 61 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Unspecified 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 65 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,239,455
of 26,281,970 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,493
of 13,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,567
of 451,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,281,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.