↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006483.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia V Bailey, Elizabeth Murray, Greta Rait, Catherine H Mercer, Richard W Morris, Richard Peacock, Jackie Cassell, Irwin Nazareth

Abstract

Sexual health promotion is a major public health challenge; there is huge potential for health promotion via technology such as the Internet.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 22%
Researcher 57 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 58 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Psychology 32 10%
Social Sciences 32 10%
Computer Science 12 4%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 69 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,059,106
of 17,895,029 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,721
of 11,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,309
of 160,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,895,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.