↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peripheral venous blood gas analysis versus arterial blood gas analysis for the diagnosis of respiratory failure and metabolic disturbance in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral venous blood gas analysis versus arterial blood gas analysis for the diagnosis of respiratory failure and metabolic disturbance in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010841
Authors

Anthony L Byrne, Michael H Bennett, Nathan L Pace, Paul Thomas

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#21,439,778
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,307
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,011
of 319,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#231
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.