↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peripheral venous blood gas analysis versus arterial blood gas analysis for the diagnosis of respiratory failure and metabolic disturbance in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral venous blood gas analysis versus arterial blood gas analysis for the diagnosis of respiratory failure and metabolic disturbance in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010841
Authors

Anthony L Byrne, Michael H Bennett, Nathan L Pace, Paul Thomas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#12,926,241
of 16,275,395 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,522
of 11,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,662
of 296,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,275,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.