Dressings and topical agents for the management of open wounds after surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Philip J Herrod, Brett Doleman, Edward J Hardy, Paul Hardy, Trevor Maloney, John P Williams, Jon N Lund
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||13||76%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||12%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||6||13%|
|Student > Master||4||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||3||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||14||30%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||4%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,378,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 429,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.