Title |
Laser photocoagulation for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004763.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gianni Virgili, Alessandro Bini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 105 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 22% |
Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,125,451
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,756
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,624
of 77,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.