↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cleavage‐stage versus blastocyst‐stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Cleavage‐stage versus blastocyst‐stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002118.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Demián Glujovsky, Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar, Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo, Agustín Ciapponi, Simone Cornelisse, Deborah Blake

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 82 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Unspecified 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 89 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,495,343
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,209
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,088
of 445,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.