| Title |
Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005088.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerry Dwan, Carrie A Phillipi, Robert D Steiner, Donald Basel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 524 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 78 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 116 | 22% |
| Unknown | 145 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 78 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 11% |
| Unknown | 161 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,336,551
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,060
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,378
of 327,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.