↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ginkgo biloba extract for age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Ginkgo biloba extract for age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001775.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer R Evans

Abstract

Ginkgo is used in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease and 'cerebral insufficiency'. It is thought to have several potential mechanisms of action including increased blood flow, platelet activating factor antagonism, and prevention of membrane damage caused by free radicals. Vascular factors and oxidative damage are thought to be two potential mechanisms in the pathology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 39 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,053,758
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,344
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,938
of 284,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.