↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spinal manipulative therapy for low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000447.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem JJ Assendelft, Sally C Morton, Emily I Yu, Marika J Suttorp, Paul G Shekelle

Abstract

Low-back pain is a costly illness for which spinal manipulative therapy is commonly recommended. Previous systematic reviews and practice guidelines have reached discordant results on the effectiveness of this therapy for low-back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Chile 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 215 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Other 22 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 63 28%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 15%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 45 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,348,007
of 19,934,082 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,292
of 11,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,267
of 167,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,934,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.