↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mono and multifaceted inhalant and/or food allergen reduction interventions for preventing asthma in children at high risk of developing asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Mono and multifaceted inhalant and/or food allergen reduction interventions for preventing asthma in children at high risk of developing asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006480.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanja Maas, Janneke Kaper, Aziz Sheikh, J. André Knottnerus, Geertjan Wesseling, Edward Dompeling, Jean WM Muris, Constant Paul van Schayck

Abstract

Allergen exposure is one of the environmental factors seemingly associated with the development of asthma. If asthma is a multi-factorial disease, it is hypothesised that prevention might only prove effective if most or all relevant environmental factors are simultaneously avoided.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 14 9%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 30 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,299,843
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,916
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,287
of 161,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.