↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mono and multifaceted inhalant and/or food allergen reduction interventions for preventing asthma in children at high risk of developing asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Mono and multifaceted inhalant and/or food allergen reduction interventions for preventing asthma in children at high risk of developing asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006480.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanja Maas, Janneke Kaper, Aziz Sheikh, J. André Knottnerus, Geertjan Wesseling, Edward Dompeling, Jean WM Muris, Constant Paul van Schayck

Abstract

Allergen exposure is one of the environmental factors seemingly associated with the development of asthma. If asthma is a multi-factorial disease, it is hypothesised that prevention might only prove effective if most or all relevant environmental factors are simultaneously avoided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 72 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 10 5%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 82 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,189,339
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,107
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,878
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.