↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological therapies for maintenance treatments of opium dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological therapies for maintenance treatments of opium dependence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007775.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Afarin Rahimi‐Movaghar, Masoumeh Amin‐Esmaeili, Mitra Hefazi, Reza Yousefi‐Nooraie

Abstract

Pharmacologic therapies for maintenance treatment of heroin dependence have been used and studied widely. Systematic reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of such therapies. Opium dependence is associated with less problems and impairments and is less likely to be used by injecting, with consequent reductions in risk of overdose and blood-borne diseases. Although it is a common substance use disorder in many countries, a systematic review of the literature is lacking on the maintenance treatment for opium dependence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 58 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 28%
Psychology 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 62 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,781,425
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,916
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,093
of 291,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.