↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1141 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008776.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kingshuk Pal, Sophie V Eastwood, Susan Michie, Andrew J Farmer, Maria L Barnard, Richard Peacock, Bindie Wood, Joni D Inniss, Elizabeth Murray

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the commonest chronic medical conditions, affecting around 347 million adults worldwide. Structured patient education programmes reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications four-fold. Internet-based self-management programmes have been shown to be effective for a number of long-term conditions, but it is unclear what are the essential or effective components of such programmes. If computer-based self-management interventions improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes, they could potentially provide a cost-effective option for reducing the burdens placed on patients and healthcare systems by this long-term condition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1107 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 200 18%
Researcher 161 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 13%
Student > Bachelor 133 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 7%
Other 215 19%
Unknown 206 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 361 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 175 15%
Psychology 105 9%
Social Sciences 57 5%
Computer Science 39 3%
Other 163 14%
Unknown 241 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#445,621
of 21,751,441 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#864
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,954
of 174,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,751,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.