The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008054.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Arbyn, Jolien Roelens, Cindy Simoens, Frank Buntinx, Evangelos Paraskevaidis, Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Walter J Prendiville |
| Abstract |
Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL) are minor lesions of the cervical epithelium, detectable by cytological examination of cells collected from the surface of the cervix of a woman.Usually, women with ASCUS and LSIL do not have cervical (pre-) cancer, however a substantial proportion of them do have underlying high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN, grade 2 or 3) and so are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Therefore, accurate triage of women with ASCUS or LSIL is required to identify those who need further management.This review evaluates two ways to triage women with ASCUS or LSIL: repeating the cytological test, and DNA testing for high-risk types of the human papillomavirus (hrHPV) - the main causal factor of cervical cancer. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Researcher | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 103 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 116 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,193,695
of 26,484,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,284
of 13,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,401
of 213,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,484,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.