| Title |
Antidepressants for non‐specific low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001703.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donna M Urquhart, Jan L Hoving, Willem JJ Assendelft, Martin Roland, Maurits W van Tulder |
| Abstract |
Antidepressants are commonly used in the management of low-back pain. However, their use is controversial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 21% |
| Unknown | 86 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,165,780
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,392
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,436
of 169,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.