| Title |
Lactase treated feeds to promote growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004591.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cherrie Rose Y Tan‐Dy, Arne Ohlsson |
| Abstract |
Successful transition from parenteral nutrition to full enteral feedings during the immediate neonatal period is associated with improved growth in preterm infants. Lactase is the last of the major intestinal disaccharidases to develop in preterm infants. Because of inadequate lactase activity, preterm infants are unable to digest lactose. Lactase preparations could potentially be used to hydrolyse lactose in formulas and breast milk to minimize lactose malabsorption in preterm infants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,771,936
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,385
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,510
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.