↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000516.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Coward, Roland Featherstone, Martin M Brown

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 28 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 32 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,042,915
of 21,689,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,734
of 12,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,859
of 173,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,689,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.