↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000516.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Coward, Roland Featherstone, Martin M Brown

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 36 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 41 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,514
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.