↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bile acids for liver‐transplanted patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bile acids for liver‐transplanted patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Poropat, Vanja Giljaca, Davor Stimac, Christian Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Other 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 32 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 39 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,142
of 110,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.