↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008319.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherie Smith, Nicola J Rowbotham, Edward Charbek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 31 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Unspecified 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 35 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,394,501
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,778
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,266
of 437,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.