↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled corticosteroids for subacute and chronic cough in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Inhaled corticosteroids for subacute and chronic cough in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009305.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate J Johnstone, Anne B Chang, Kwun M Fong, Rayleen V Bowman, Ian A Yang

Abstract

Persistent cough is a common clinical problem. Despite thorough investigation and empirical management, a considerable proportion of those people with subacute and chronic cough have unexplained cough, for which treatment options are limited. While current guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the research evidence for this intervention is conflicting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 65 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 66 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,331,207
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,087
of 12,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,091
of 199,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.