↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002265.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani, Aldemar A Castro, João Ferreira Neves Neto, Álvaro N Atallah

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is complex and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Management of nervous system manifestations of SLE remains unsatisfactory. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and previously updated in 2006.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 54%
Psychology 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,408,361
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,718
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,457
of 207,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.