↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002265.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani, Aldemar A Castro, João Ferreira Neves Neto, Álvaro N Atallah

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is complex and it is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Management of nervous system manifestations of SLE remains unsatisfactory. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and previously updated in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Postgraduate 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 38 26%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 60%
Psychology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 23 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,126,408
of 15,426,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,751
of 11,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,091
of 154,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,426,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.