↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
506 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002098
Authors

Rosemary Currell, Christine Urquhart, Paul Wainwright, Ruth Lewis, Currell, Rosemary, Urquhart, Christine, Wainwright, Paul, Lewis, Ruth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 480 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 18%
Researcher 71 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 124 25%
Unknown 81 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 185 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 8%
Computer Science 39 8%
Social Sciences 38 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 4%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 104 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,196,095
of 21,346,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,200
of 12,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,429
of 174,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.