↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007697.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Hiu, Andrew Bryant, Ketankumar Gajjar, Patience T Kunonga, Raj Naik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,544,327
of 22,248,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,046
of 12,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,490
of 316,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,248,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.