↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003878.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Hassan Maghaireh, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

To minimise the risk of implant failures after their placement, dental implants are kept load-free for 3 to 8 months to establish osseointegration (conventional loading). It would be beneficial if the healing period could be shortened without jeopardising implant success. Nowadays implants are loaded early and even immediately and it would be useful to know whether there is a difference in success rates between immediately and early loaded implants compared with conventionally loaded implants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 521 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 22%
Student > Postgraduate 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Student > Bachelor 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 98 18%
Unknown 116 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 311 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Engineering 8 1%
Other 38 7%
Unknown 140 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,383,968
of 20,902,589 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,318
of 12,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,494
of 173,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,902,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.