↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007623.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Cluver, Natalia Novikova, G Justus Hofmeyr, David R Hall

Abstract

During caesarean section mothers can be in different positions. Theatre tables could be tilted laterally, upwards, downwards or flexed and wedges or cushions could be used. There is no consensus on the best positioning at present.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Master 16 9%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 41 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#824,280
of 15,646,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,295
of 11,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,475
of 155,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,646,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.