| Title |
Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007623.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine Cluver, Natalia Novikova, G Justus Hofmeyr, David R Hall |
| Abstract |
During caesarean section mothers can be in different positions. Theatre tables could be tilted laterally, upwards, downwards or flexed and wedges or cushions could be used. There is no consensus on the best positioning at present. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Grenada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,071,888
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,411
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,508
of 210,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.