↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002060
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Mills, David Tudehope

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 55 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Chemistry 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,296,578
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,739
of 114,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.