Title |
Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002060 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John F. Mills, David Tudehope |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 21% |
Unknown | 49 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,296,578
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,739
of 114,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.