↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002060
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Mills, David Tudehope

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Chemistry 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 37 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,183,517
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,767
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,688
of 113,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.